EU Think Tank
  • Home
  • Business
  • Leadership
  • Economics
  • Recruitment
  • Innovation
  • Strategy
  • More
    • Customer Experience
    • Managing People
    • Managing Yourself
    • Communication
    • Marketing
    • Organizational Culture
    • Technology
Featured Posts
    • Managing Yourself
    How to Recover from Work Stress, According to Science
    • July 6, 2022
    • Managing Yourself
    Reeling From a Sudden Job Loss? Here’s How to Start Healing.
    • July 6, 2022
    • Managing People
    Companies Must Be Robust in Six Key Areas to Cope with Uncertainty – SPONSOR CONTENT FROM ROLAND BERGER
    • July 6, 2022
    • Technology
    Build Better Management Systems to Put Your Data to Work
    • July 5, 2022
    • Economics
    How Businesses Can Hold Their Banks Accountable on Climate Change
    • July 5, 2022
Featured Categories
Business
View Posts
Communication
View Posts
Customer Experience
View Posts
Economics
View Posts
Green
View Posts
Health
View Posts
Hiring and Recruitment
View Posts
Innovation
View Posts
Leadership
View Posts
Managing People
View Posts
Managing Yourself
View Posts
Marketing
View Posts
Middle East
View Posts
News
View Posts
Organizational Culture
View Posts
Russia
View Posts
Saudi Arabia
View Posts
Strategy
View Posts
Technology
View Posts
Ukraine
View Posts
Uncategorized
View Posts
EU Think Tank EU Think Tank
7K
9K
4K
1K
EU Think Tank EU Think Tank
  • Home
  • Business
  • Leadership
  • Economics
  • Recruitment
  • Innovation
  • Strategy
  • More
    • Customer Experience
    • Managing People
    • Managing Yourself
    • Communication
    • Marketing
    • Organizational Culture
    • Technology
  • Innovation

When Individuals Are More Innovative Than Teams

  • December 10, 2021
  • euthinktank
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0

Research has found that teams generally outperform individuals when attempting to create impactful innovations such as highly cited technological patents or scientific publications. But a new study uncovers a factor that plays a key role in determining whether team outcomes will be superior to those of lone inventors: the structure of the invention, that is the extent to which the invention can be broken down into separate components or “modules”.

It is widely believed that breakthrough innovation is more likely to be achieved by teams. Research has found that teams generally outperform individuals when attempting to create impactful innovations such as highly cited technological patents or scientific publications.

However, our research has uncovered a factor that plays a key role in determining whether team outcomes will be superior to those of lone inventors: the structure of the invention — that is, the extent to which the invention can be broken down into separate components or “modules.”

We analyzed 1,603,970 utility patents (awarded for innovation in function, such as for a product, process, or machine) and 198,265 design patents (innovation in form, such as a distinct visual configuration or ornamentation of a product), filed between 1985 and 2009 with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

We tallied the number of “breakthrough” inventions, defined as those whose number of citations is within the top 5% of its product class. (The success of an invention is commonly measured by how often it is cited in patents by subsequent inventors.) We then tested whether a given inventor was more likely to get a patent for a breakthrough invention when developing it as part of a team of inventors or as a solo inventor.

Similar to previous research, we found that a utility patent is more likely to be a breakthrough when a team of inventors created it. However, we also found that this team advantage completely disappears for design patents. Individual inventors are just as likely to produce breakthrough design patents as teams.

Why do teams lose their advantage when creating design inventions?

Consider iconic designs, such as the Coca-Cola curvy bottle or the iPhone, and how our perception of them is fundamentally holistic, meaning we perceive the entirety of their design and not their individual components, such as the opening of the bottle or the curvature of the corners of the iPhone. The elements all go together — they’re highly interdependent — so we can’t immediately isolate the exact contribution of each of the parts to the whole design.

We believe that this interdependency between the parts of an invention significantly influences the dynamics of the invention process. A team working on design is likely to struggle should it attempt a divide-and-conquer approach to finding a holistic solution.

Imagine a team attempting to create a new painting. It is possible, but the effort required to coordinate and communicate ideas among team members is time- and resource-intensive. By contrast, the lone inventor can mentally assess, iterate, and discard possibilities with ease, because they do not face a team’s communication and coordination requirements. These extra efforts would outweigh the benefits of working collaboratively when the invention at hand is holistic as most design patents are.

Our theory would suggest that the effectiveness of teams and lone inventors is strongly affected by a fundamental aspect of the invention: its level of modularity, or how easily it can be partitioned into its different components. Technology inventions vary in terms of modularity. Some inventions are very modular and can be partitioned into well-defined components. For example, Dell PCs are configured to accept a wide range of independent and interchangeable components that can be easily connected together, without affecting the overall functionality. If a team is working on a technological invention that is modular, team members may be encouraged to operate autonomously, allowing them to reap the advantages of knowledge diversity and shared resources with minimum coordination costs.

Other technological inventions, however, include many interdependent elements that are difficult to separate into individual parts. The reliable two-stroke internal combustion engine first invented by Karl Benz is an example of this kind of integral invention. Each component was specifically designed to fit within a tightly integrated and complex structure. These features could not be adapted or interchanged easily, since the components were heavily reliant on one another to produce the desired effect.

Akin to design inventions, we argue that the lone inventor is likely to make faster progress on integral inventions, since a team can be slowed down by communication and coordination challenges. On the other hand, breakthrough modular inventions can more often be accomplished through teamwork. When examining all the utility patents in our sample, we found that the probability advantage that a team of inventors would get a breakthrough would significantly decrease if the invention was less modular. Moreover, the advantage of teams would completely disappear when the utility patent was highly integral (or non-modular).

Does this mean collaboration has no inherent value for holistic innovations? Quite the opposite: We find that collaboration improves inventors’ development. Extensive collaboration allows inventors to assimilate their colleagues’ skills and build network resources that serve as channels of valuable information. Previous collaborators can offer feedback on ideas and identify other valuable resources, providing the lone inventor with some team-oriented benefits without imposing any team-induced coordination costs.

Accordingly, we find that lone inventors who never collaborate tend to perform poorly, whereas those who have collaborated often in the past exhibit a higher probability of creating breakthroughs when dealing with holistic inventions.

So in order to increase your chances of achieving a breakthrough, align the structure of the collaboration with the invention and its level of modularity – and don’t forget to consider innovators’ collaboration histories. The cost-benefit trade-off for teams can change dramatically depending on the degree to which the invention can be partitioned into independent components. Automatically assuming that teams are the best way to proceed may negate your innovation efforts. Lone inventors, particularly those who have built up an extensive collaborative network, need to be recognized as an effective resource for design and integral inventions.

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Pin it 0
You May Also Like
Read More
  • Innovation

Four Ways Digital Leaders are Accelerating Their Innovation Strategy – SPONSOR CONTENT FROM EY-PARTHENON

  • euthinktank
  • June 17, 2022
Read More
  • Innovation

Using Fiction to Find Your Strategy

  • euthinktank
  • June 14, 2022
Read More
  • Health
  • Innovation
  • News
  • Technology

The Global Mission to Tackle Cancer

  • Sam Tilston
  • June 14, 2022
Read More
  • Innovation

Identifying Unmet Needs in a Digital Age

  • euthinktank
  • June 14, 2022
Read More
  • Innovation

Think You Have a Great Idea? Ask These 6 Questions to Gain Perspective.

  • euthinktank
  • May 19, 2022
Read More
  • Innovation

What a DAO Can — and Can’t — Do

  • euthinktank
  • May 11, 2022
Read More
  • Innovation

Accenture CEO Julie Sweet on the Most Important Skill Job Seekers Need Today

  • euthinktank
  • May 7, 2022
Read More
  • Innovation

Video Quick Take: Syneos Health’s Larry Pickett on Using Data and Technology to Improve Patient Outcomes – SPONSOR CONTENT FROM PERSISTENT SYSTEMS

  • euthinktank
  • April 30, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Featured Posts
  • 1
    How to Recover from Work Stress, According to Science
    • July 6, 2022
  • 2
    Reeling From a Sudden Job Loss? Here’s How to Start Healing.
    • July 6, 2022
  • Companies Must Be Robust in Six Key Areas to Cope with Uncertainty – SPONSOR CONTENT FROM ROLAND BERGER
    • July 6, 2022
  • 4
    Build Better Management Systems to Put Your Data to Work
    • July 5, 2022
  • 5
    How Businesses Can Hold Their Banks Accountable on Climate Change
    • July 5, 2022
Recent Posts
  • So You Haven’t Heard Back After a Job Interview…
    • July 5, 2022
  • What Makes a Great Executive Retreat
    • July 5, 2022
  • Adapt Your Digital Marketing Strategy to Post-Pandemic Consumer Behaviors – SPONSOR CONTENT FROM MICROSOFT
    • July 5, 2022

Sign Up for Our Newsletters

Subscribe now to our newsletter

EU Think Tank
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Guest Post
  • Contact

Input your search keywords and press Enter.