EU Think Tank
  • Home
  • Business
  • Leadership
  • Economics
  • Recruitment
  • Innovation
  • Strategy
  • More
    • Customer Experience
    • Managing People
    • Managing Yourself
    • Communication
    • Marketing
    • Organizational Culture
    • Technology
Featured Posts
    • Economics
    Is America in Decline?
    • June 25, 2022
    • Marketing
    Stop Losing Sales to Customer Indecision
    • June 24, 2022
    • Organizational Culture
    How to Make Your Business More Resilient Webinar – SPONSORED CONTENT FROM TRINET
    • June 24, 2022
    • Managing Yourself
    Why Microsoft Measures Employee Thriving, Not Engagement
    • June 24, 2022
    • Strategy
    Build a Strategy that Addresses Your Gnarliest Challenges
    • June 23, 2022
Featured Categories
Business
View Posts
Communication
View Posts
Customer Experience
View Posts
Economics
View Posts
Green
View Posts
Health
View Posts
Hiring and Recruitment
View Posts
Innovation
View Posts
Leadership
View Posts
Managing People
View Posts
Managing Yourself
View Posts
Marketing
View Posts
Middle East
View Posts
News
View Posts
Organizational Culture
View Posts
Russia
View Posts
Saudi Arabia
View Posts
Strategy
View Posts
Technology
View Posts
Ukraine
View Posts
Uncategorized
View Posts
EU Think Tank EU Think Tank
7K
9K
4K
1K
EU Think Tank EU Think Tank
  • Home
  • Business
  • Leadership
  • Economics
  • Recruitment
  • Innovation
  • Strategy
  • More
    • Customer Experience
    • Managing People
    • Managing Yourself
    • Communication
    • Marketing
    • Organizational Culture
    • Technology
  • Economics

The Brain—and Soul—of Capitalism

  • December 30, 2021
  • euthinktank
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0

In 1970 the economist and Nobel laureate Milton Friedman called corporate social responsibility “hypocritical window dressing,” saying that businesspeople inclined toward it “reveal a suicidal impulse.” How times have changed. Some executives still take a Friedmanesque view, but most accept social and civic responsibilities as indispensable to doing good business; their enterprises won’t survive if those responsibilities are ignored.

Keep in mind that capitalism needs a brain and a soul.

Solving today’s burning issues—social, environmental, political, and financial—requires bigger goals, new incentives, and a reconception of what business really is. It also requires leaders with moral muscle who are willing to pursue sustainable goodness and positive impact despite colossal challenges. Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz and Unilever CEO Paul Polman are champions in this movement: Their long-term missions and pursuits are models for building companies to last.

Invest in people above all.

A company’s most important assets—mission, reputation, and people—are not on the balance sheet. Schultz is deeply invested not only in Starbucks’s 200,000 partners (employees) but also in its global coffee bean farmers. Whether offering stock options and health coverage to part-time U.S. workers, hosting “family partner forums” for employees’ parents in Beijing and Shanghai, or donating cows to coffee farmers in Rwanda, he sees enlightened decision making as smart business: Health benefits and parent engagement build trust among employees; cows for coffee farmers strengthen loyalty and productivity. “To be a benevolent organization, you have to make a lot of profit,” he told Fortune in 2011. “But if your sole goal is to maximize profit, you’re on a collision course with time.”

Live the adage “From those to whom much is given, much is required.”

Starbucks and Unilever may have a resource advantage, but they use their brand, visibility, and scale to blend capitalism with activism to influence change. Polman tackles global malnutrition; Schultz addresses other big-picture issues such as job creation and political disunion. And people respond. When Schultz called on major corporations to halt all political campaign contributions until the U.S. government solved the budget deficit, nearly 200 top executives of major companies signed on. He’s resolute: “Business leaders cannot be bystanders.”

Starbucks and Unilever use their brand, visibility, and scale to blend capitalism and activism to influence change.

Fail and keep learning.

While other CEOs talk about change, Polman is grafting measurable sustainability onto Unilever’s DNA. His goals are ambitious: reduce the greenhouse gas impact of Unilever products by 50%; source 100% of raw materials sustainably; help one billion people improve hygiene. Such transformation is not without risks: If successful, Polman will be a role model; but if Unilever falters, critics will call for his head. He understands that to address social issues, business must experiment and innovate.

Schultz and Polman represent a growing corps of 21st-century leaders who are demanding bigger, bolder things of business—not primarily as a moral obligation (although that’s very important) but as an imperative for enduring organizational success. In the next decade we’ll see others forge their own models, just as we’ll see the decline of companies that cannot summon the moral courage demanded by principled leadership.

Unilever’s goal is to “stay close to society to guarantee our future.” Polman says that what he’s doing is “nothing special.” But if his and Schultz’s actions motivate others to follow, the impact will be extraordinary.

A version of this article appeared in the November 2013 issue of Harvard Business Review.

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Pin it 0
You May Also Like
Read More
  • Economics

Is America in Decline?

  • euthinktank
  • June 25, 2022
Read More
  • Economics

What Sales Teams Should Do to Prepare for the Next Recession

  • euthinktank
  • June 23, 2022
Read More
  • Economics

Roaring Out of Recession

  • euthinktank
  • June 21, 2022
Read More
  • Economics

These 3 Personality Traits Affect What You Earn — but Only After Age 40

  • euthinktank
  • June 18, 2022
Read More
  • Economics

How Companies Should Invest in a Downturn

  • euthinktank
  • June 18, 2022
Read More
  • Economics

How to Encourage Employees to Speak Up When They See Wrongdoing

  • euthinktank
  • June 11, 2022
Read More
  • Economics

Economics Needs More Socioeconomic Diversity

  • euthinktank
  • June 11, 2022
Read More
  • Economics

Weighing the Risks of Inflation, Recession, and Stagflation in the U.S. Economy

  • euthinktank
  • June 11, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Featured Posts
  • 1
    Is America in Decline?
    • June 25, 2022
  • 2
    Stop Losing Sales to Customer Indecision
    • June 24, 2022
  • 3
    How to Make Your Business More Resilient Webinar – SPONSORED CONTENT FROM TRINET
    • June 24, 2022
  • 4
    Why Microsoft Measures Employee Thriving, Not Engagement
    • June 24, 2022
  • 5
    Build a Strategy that Addresses Your Gnarliest Challenges
    • June 23, 2022
Recent Posts
  • Supporting Your Team When the News Is Terrible
    • June 23, 2022
  • Dehumanization Is a Feature of Gig Work, Not a Bug
    • June 23, 2022
  • What Sales Teams Should Do to Prepare for the Next Recession
    • June 23, 2022

Sign Up for Our Newsletters

Subscribe now to our newsletter

EU Think Tank
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Guest Post
  • Contact

Input your search keywords and press Enter.