EU Think Tank
  • Home
  • Business
  • Leadership
  • Economics
  • Recruitment
  • Innovation
  • Strategy
  • More
    • Customer Experience
    • Managing People
    • Managing Yourself
    • Communication
    • Marketing
    • Organizational Culture
    • Technology
Featured Posts
    • Managing Yourself
    What Are Your Decision-Making Strengths and Blind Spots?
    • August 9, 2022
    • Customer Experience
    Where Net Promoter Score Goes Wrong
    • August 9, 2022
    • Managing Yourself
    What to Do If Your Team Is Underperforming
    • August 9, 2022
    • Managing People
    Solving Tough Problems Requires a Mindset Shift
    • August 9, 2022
    • Technology
    Generating Stronger Business Outcomes Through Customer Data – SPONSORED CONTENT FROM SAP
    • August 9, 2022
Featured Categories
Business
View Posts
Communication
View Posts
Customer Experience
View Posts
Economics
View Posts
Green
View Posts
Health
View Posts
Hiring and Recruitment
View Posts
Innovation
View Posts
Leadership
View Posts
Managing People
View Posts
Managing Yourself
View Posts
Marketing
View Posts
Middle East
View Posts
News
View Posts
Organizational Culture
View Posts
Russia
View Posts
Saudi Arabia
View Posts
Strategy
View Posts
Technology
View Posts
Ukraine
View Posts
Uncategorized
View Posts
EU Think Tank EU Think Tank
7K
9K
4K
1K
EU Think Tank EU Think Tank
  • Home
  • Business
  • Leadership
  • Economics
  • Recruitment
  • Innovation
  • Strategy
  • More
    • Customer Experience
    • Managing People
    • Managing Yourself
    • Communication
    • Marketing
    • Organizational Culture
    • Technology
  • Customer Experience

More Isn’t Always Better

  • July 29, 2022
  • euthinktank
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0

Reprint: F0606C

Offering customers too many product choices may decrease their sense of well-being.

Marketers assume that the more choices they offer, the more likely customers will be able to find just the right thing. They assume, for instance, that offering 50 styles of jeans instead of two increases the chances that shoppers will find a pair they really like. Nevertheless, research now shows that there can be too much choice; when there is, consumers are less likely to buy anything at all, and if they do buy, they are less satisfied with their selection.

It all began with jam. In 2000, psychologists Sheena Iyengar and Mark Lepper published a remarkable study. On one day, shoppers at an upscale food market saw a display table with 24 varieties of gourmet jam. Those who sampled the spreads received a coupon for $1 off any jam. On another day, shoppers saw a similar table, except that only six varieties of the jam were on display. The large display attracted more interest than the small one. But when the time came to purchase, people who saw the large display were one-tenth as likely to buy as people who saw the small display.

Other studies have confirmed this result that more choice is not always better. As the variety of snacks, soft drinks, and beers offered at convenience stores increases, for instance, sales volume and customer satisfaction decrease. Moreover, as the number of retirement investment options available to employees increases, the chance that they will choose any decreases. These studies and others have shown not only that excessive choice can produce “choice paralysis,” but also that it can reduce people’s satisfaction with their decisions, even if they made good ones. My colleagues and I have found that increased choice decreases satisfaction with matters as trivial as ice cream flavors and as significant as jobs.

These results challenge what we think we know about human nature and the determinants of well-being. Both psychology and business have operated on the assumption that the relationship between choice and well-being is straightforward: The more choices people have, the better off they are. In psychology, the benefits of choice have been tied to autonomy and control. In business, the benefits of choice have been tied to the benefits of free markets more generally. Added options make no one worse off, and they are bound to make someone better off.

Choice is good for us, but its relationship to satisfaction appears to be more complicated than we had assumed. There is diminishing marginal utility in having alternatives; each new option subtracts a little from the feeling of well-being, until the marginal benefits of added choice level off. What’s more, psychologists and business academics alike have largely ignored another outcome of choice: More of it requires increased time and effort and can lead to anxiety, regret, excessively high expectations, and self-blame if the choices don’t work out. When the number of available options is small, these costs are negligible, but the costs grow with the number of options. Eventually, each new option makes us feel worse off than we did before.

Without a doubt, having more options enables us, most of the time, to achieve better objective outcomes. Again, having 50 styles of jeans as opposed to two increases the likelihood that customers will find a pair that fits. But the subjective outcome may be that shoppers will feel overwhelmed and dissatisfied. This dissociation between objective and subjective results creates a significant challenge for retailers and marketers that look to choice as a way to enhance the perceived value of their goods and services.

Choice can no longer be used to justify a marketing strategy in and of itself. More isn’t always better, either for the customer or for the retailer. Discovering how much assortment is warranted is a considerable empirical challenge. But companies that get the balance right will be amply rewarded.

A version of this article appeared in the June 2006 issue of Harvard Business Review.

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Pin it 0
You May Also Like
Read More
  • Customer Experience

Where Net Promoter Score Goes Wrong

  • euthinktank
  • August 9, 2022
Read More
  • Customer Experience

To Keep Your Customers, Keep It Simple

  • euthinktank
  • August 8, 2022
Read More
  • Customer Experience

Analytics 3.0

  • euthinktank
  • August 8, 2022
Read More
  • Customer Experience

The New Science of Customer Emotions

  • euthinktank
  • August 5, 2022
Read More
  • Customer Experience

Henry Ford, Innovation, and That “Faster Horse” Quote

  • euthinktank
  • August 4, 2022
Read More
  • Customer Experience

Using Customer Journey Maps to Improve Customer Experience

  • euthinktank
  • August 3, 2022
Read More
  • Customer Experience

Why Satisfied Customers Defect

  • euthinktank
  • July 30, 2022
Read More
  • Customer Experience

Competing on the Eight Dimensions of Quality

  • euthinktank
  • July 30, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Featured Posts
  • 1
    What Are Your Decision-Making Strengths and Blind Spots?
    • August 9, 2022
  • 2
    Where Net Promoter Score Goes Wrong
    • August 9, 2022
  • 3
    What to Do If Your Team Is Underperforming
    • August 9, 2022
  • 4
    Solving Tough Problems Requires a Mindset Shift
    • August 9, 2022
  • 5
    Generating Stronger Business Outcomes Through Customer Data – SPONSORED CONTENT FROM SAP
    • August 9, 2022
Recent Posts
  • To Keep Your Customers, Keep It Simple
    • August 8, 2022
  • Is Your Company Squandering Digital Opportunities?
    • August 8, 2022
  • Analytics 3.0
    • August 8, 2022

Sign Up for Our Newsletters

Subscribe now to our newsletter

EU Think Tank
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Guest Post
  • Contact

Input your search keywords and press Enter.